Evaluation of tapelifting as a collection method for touch DNA.
FSI Genetics, 2014
Authors
Journal
FSI Genetics
Study Design
Addressed Question
evaluation of the efficiency of different sampling methods for touch DNA
Activity Context
Category
Specifications
Variables of Interest
Stringency of Control
Number of Individuals
1
Replicates per Individual and Condition
8-28
Nucleic Acid
Bodily Origin
Depositor & Contact
Depositor Characteristics
one good shedder
Criteria for Shedder Status
N/A
Previous Activities
N/A
Contact Scenario
deposition of DNA on primary substrate - sampling
Primary Substrate
Primary Substrate Type
four fabric types: poly/cotton, cotton flannelette, drill-woven cotton, polyester strapping; 250x150mm pieces
Primary Substrate Material
Deposit
rubbing over material with whole hand
Delay
N/A
Secondary Substrate
Secondary Substrate Type
N/A
Secondary Substrate Material
N/A
Secondary Substrate Contact
N/A
Further Transfer
N/A
Sampling
Background DNA on Sampled Surface
Sampling Time
direct
Persistence
N/A
Sampling Method
tapelifting by Scenesafe FAST minitapes or Scotch 810 Magic tapes (1,2,4,8,16,32 or 64 times) or swabbing (wet+dry) as well as direct extraction from material after first sampling
Sampling Area
sampling of 25x38mm area
Laboratory Analysis
Extraction
DNA IQ on Biomek NXp liquid handling platforms
DNA Quantification
Quantifiler (Life Technologies)
Input for Profiling
0.5 ng or max. of 15µl template DNA
Profiling
PowerPlex 21 system, ABI Prism 3500 Genetic analyzer, GeneMapper ID-X, threshold: 50rfu
Reference Samples
taken from donor
Profile Interpretation and Mixture Analysis
comparison to donor's reference profile, contribution from unknown sources deemed insignificant
RNA Data Interpretation
N/A
Results
DNA Quantity
N/A
Profile Quality
partial to complete profiles depending on sampling method, mainly random dropout due to low template quantity and not degradation
Parameter Used for Comparison
mean % recovery (=amount of DNA from tape or swab/(DNA from tape or swab + DNA from direct extraction), donor allele counts
Summary of Results
Scenesafe FAST tapes performed significantly better in most experiments or equally good compared to Scotch Magic tapes and cotton swabs: higher mean % recovery, higher donor allele counts; Mean % recovery increased with the number of tapings and then decreased after a certain threshold point (8 tapings for Scotch Magic tape, 32 tapings for Scenesafe FAST); median number of alleles recovered mostly not dependent on number of tapings; Scenesafe FAST taping is more efficient (higher mean % recovery and higher donor allele counts) from cotton and cotton/flannelette but not from strapping and flannelette; mean % recovery varied between 10-60%; DNA recovery efficiency from different substrate types: polyester strapping <cotton, polyester/cotton, polyester/cotton <flannelette
Raised Questions
suggestions of double sampling: tapelifting for surface DNA recently left and direct extraction, swabbing or vacuum methods for background DNA; effect of the sampled area? Variation among results by different samplers? Analyze variables affecting the deposit of touch DNA (pressure, duration of deposit, deposit area)? effects of taping glue on extraction? comparison of taping and swabbing for other substrates;
Cautionary Remarks
absolute quantification results n.s. (only from substrates after swabbing/taping); direct extraction from fabric not 100% efficient and possibly fabric-type specific; number and dependency/independency of replicates not entirely clear from method section