Comparison of stubbing and the double swab method for collecting offender epithelial material from a victim’s skin.
FSI Genetics, 2011
Authors
Journal
FSI Genetics
Study Design
Addressed Question
comparison of double-swabbing and stubbing as method to obtain cellular skin cells deposited on skin
Activity Context
Category
Specifications
Variables of Interest
Stringency of Control
Number of Individuals
50x2
Replicates per Individual and Condition
1
Nucleic Acid
Bodily Origin
Depositor & Contact
Depositor Characteristics
male-female couples, match based on minimum overlap DNA profile
Criteria for Shedder Status
N/A
Previous Activities
2h no handwashing, rubbing hands together for 5s to loosen epithelial cells
Contact Scenario
males rubbing hands together 5s - deposit scenario - dividing deposit area into two equal halfs - sampling each half by one of the two sampling methods
Primary Substrate
Primary Substrate Type
body part: female forearm
Primary Substrate Material
Deposit
pressure 5 s, friction by rubbing hands 2x around the whole forearm
Delay
N/A
Secondary Substrate
Secondary Substrate Type
N/A
Secondary Substrate Material
N/A
Secondary Substrate Contact
N/A
Further Transfer
N/A
Sampling
Background DNA on Sampled Surface
Sampling Time
direct
Persistence
N/A
Sampling Method
double swabbing (moistening agent: sterile, distilled water) or stubbing (modified adhesive tapes for minimal contamination risk) with minimum pressure
Sampling Area
half of the deposit area
Laboratory Analysis
Extraction
QIAamp DNA Mini kit
DNA Quantification
N/A
Input for Profiling
set volume: 5/100 µl extract
Profiling
AmpFlSTR Identifiler PCR amplification kit, 3130xl ABI Prism Genetic Analyzer, GeneMapper ID v3.2.1, threshold: 20 rfu
Reference Samples
taken from all participants
Profile Interpretation and Mixture Analysis
comparison to reference profiles, shared alleles counted towards both donors
RNA Data Interpretation
N/A
Results
DNA Quantity
N/A
Profile Quality
mostly partial profiles, on average more complete profiles from offenders
Parameter Used for Comparison
profile quality (no, partial profile (1-9, 10-19, 20-29 alleles), full profile); difference in # of alleles detected by swabbing and by stubbing; Off:Vic ration based on peak heights
Summary of Results
stubbing and swabbing equally efficient for obtaining offender profiles; stubbing more efficient for obtaining victim profiles; regarding Off:Vic-peak height ratios, both methods are equally effective; conclusion: double swabbing marginally better suited as it is more important to obtain offender DNA, (advantages of stubbing: easier to handle, more standardizable)
Raised Questions
N/A
Cautionary Remarks
maximum chance conditions due to known deposition area, direct sampling; absence of any foreign alleles contradicts what is found in most other publications